Home » Most Recent Stories

THOUGHTS ON THE “BETTER THAN EXPECTED” NEW HOMES SALES

27 July 2009 by Cullen Roche 4 Comments

The financial news networks are just loving the “better than expected” news on new home sales.  It’s amazing the conclusions people will come up with by just reading headline news reports without delving into the details of an economic news release.  The real details of today’s new homes report shows substantial weakness.

I’ve been banging the drum on the seasonality of housing for many months now.  We see this every single year.  The spring buying season leads to better than expected sales across the board.  If you back out the seasonal adjustment you’ll actually notice that the climb in units was just 3K. Mark Hanson at Field Check makes an interesting point on the climb in units:

“One thousand homes selling in the Northeast and two thousand in the Midwest was the extent of the gain over May. Again, that many properties either got a Notice-of-Default or were foreclosed upon in CA TODAY alone.

The unadjusted year over year figures show equally weak data.  Prices are down 12% and sales are down over 20%:

saeshouse

Econoday notes the strength in the figures:

“But not all the news is great. Sales were given a boost by deep discounting as the median price tumbled 5.8 percent in the month to $206,2000. The year-on-year price change fell to minus 12.0 percent from May’s minus 4.5 percent. Evidently prices are finding their own level in what will help rebalance the market but will unfortunately increase negative equity and pressure on foreclosures.”

Onthe bright side, inventories of new homes came down from 10.2 months to 8.8 months.  This is without a doubt a positive, but it’s important to note the strong seasonal trends at work here.  The real test of the housing market will come in the 3rd and 4th quarters.

Source: Field Check Group

Cullen Roche

Cullen Roche

Bio - Coming Soon.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterYouTube

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • brian

    The real question of these better than expected economic numbers is where do they get these forecasters? No one has published any list of who is surveyed, how credible they are and if they have spent any time tracking the data. At least with stock analysts we know their track record, but these news poll of economists make the direction of the economy all that more uncertain.

  • Cullen Roche TPC

    It’s insane how much the consensus analyst opinion matters on Wall Street. Investors are so thirsty for someone else to do all of the work for them rather than actually studying the underlying data. Today’s number was undeniably weak. But it was “better than expected”. Who cares?

  • Onlooker

    Regarding the inventory improvement, that’s short-lived as there are tons of houses out there just waiting to go on the market; delayed foreclosures, REOs, people waiting for improved pricing, etc. That will keep a damper on this thing for a long time.

  • Anonymous

    TPC, the new house selling data as you said is lower sales price, and lower sales volume. is that suggesting a bottom? hehe… just thinking technical 101 here.