<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 INVESTMENT THEMES FROM WALL STREET&#8217;S TOP BANK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/wall-sts-best-ban/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/wall-sts-best-ban</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brick</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/wall-sts-best-ban/comment-page-1#comment-7218</link>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10845#comment-7218</guid>
		<description>1) Yes
2) While essentially true you cannot just ignore currency devaluation and its effects on commodity prices.Stagflation seems a possibility to me.
3) Banks will need to hold more bonds and I would see this as a positive sign for Australian bonds and the like. These countries will held back by currency appreciation though.
4) No. There is a good reason why asian economies are trying to intervene to keep their currencies down and there will be an impact on them from current dollar declines.
5) Yes but I would argue that we are not three quarters of the way through with a lot of commercial real estate pain to come.
6) Yes exactly.
7) Partially, I see investors moving much more into ETF&#039;s on commodities and expect a bit of a bubble in food prices.
8) Yes and this has some very important consequences for the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Yes<br />
2) While essentially true you cannot just ignore currency devaluation and its effects on commodity prices.Stagflation seems a possibility to me.<br />
3) Banks will need to hold more bonds and I would see this as a positive sign for Australian bonds and the like. These countries will held back by currency appreciation though.<br />
4) No. There is a good reason why asian economies are trying to intervene to keep their currencies down and there will be an impact on them from current dollar declines.<br />
5) Yes but I would argue that we are not three quarters of the way through with a lot of commercial real estate pain to come.<br />
6) Yes exactly.<br />
7) Partially, I see investors moving much more into ETF&#8217;s on commodities and expect a bit of a bubble in food prices.<br />
 <img src='http://pragcap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Yes and this has some very important consequences for the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/wall-sts-best-ban/comment-page-1#comment-7168</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10845#comment-7168</guid>
		<description>Sure thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (market folly)</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/wall-sts-best-ban/comment-page-1#comment-7165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay (market folly)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10845#comment-7165</guid>
		<description>good stuff TPC thanks for posting this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good stuff TPC thanks for posting this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxxxxL</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/wall-sts-best-ban/comment-page-1#comment-7144</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxxxL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10845#comment-7144</guid>
		<description>A quick look at JP Morgan balance sheet:
 
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/incomeStatement?stmtType=BAL&amp;perType=INT&amp;symbol=JPM.N

156 Billion USD equities
No decrease in assets (150 billion usd) in a year life span 2008 vs 2009
Around 2 trillion USD total assets
85 trillion USD contingent  liabilities

A thourough reading of the last IMF report provide for a better guidance.

http://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/GFSR/2009/02/pdf/text.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick look at JP Morgan balance sheet:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/incomeStatement?stmtType=BAL&#038;perType=INT&#038;symbol=JPM.N" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/incomeStatement?stmtType=BAL&#038;perType=INT&#038;symbol=JPM.N</a></p>
<p>156 Billion USD equities<br />
No decrease in assets (150 billion usd) in a year life span 2008 vs 2009<br />
Around 2 trillion USD total assets<br />
85 trillion USD contingent  liabilities</p>
<p>A thourough reading of the last IMF report provide for a better guidance.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/GFSR/2009/02/pdf/text.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/GFSR/2009/02/pdf/text.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

