Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

When the Foundation of Modern Econ Begins to Crumble….

Noah Smith has an interesting post up today discussing a new study that questions the validity of basing economic models on the assumption that people’s preferences are stable.  Now, if you’re a layperson or a market practitioner you probably think that’s a silly assumption to begin with.  Markets are, as Warren Buffett referred to them, “manic”.   An economic system is a non-linear dynamical system.  So when we start trying to model that system like it exists in a vacuum then you inevitably come to this conclusion (per Noah):

“Modern (“neoclassical”) economic theory has been pretty successful at describing people’s decision-making patterns in static settings, but not so good at describing how people make decisions in dynamic settings.”

In other words, you get conclusions that don’t reflect our reality very well.  That’s not really all that surprising.  The microfoundations of modern economics are based on all sorts of similarly flawed assumptions that leave cracks in the models.  That’s why we have things like the Efficient Market Hypothesis and Rational Expectations to begin with.  Economists prefer not to look at the world for what it is, but instead prefer to construct models by extrapolating faulty micro assumptions out into the entire macro system.

Anyhow, it would be my hope that this starts to reframe the discussion a little bit.  Economics is too important to be left entirely to biased theorists who refuse to try to better understand reality.  But I doubt anyone will seriously consider changing their models much because that would also involve a lot of mea culpas.  And since we’re totally irrational animals, we’d prefer not to deal with mea culpas because then everyone might perceive us as being weak even though the mea culpa will actually improve our thought processes.  Oh well.

Comments are closed.