Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Who Cares if Economics is a “Science”?

It’s silly season again. The Nobel Prize in economics is being announced in a few hours and we’re already seeing the uproar over the award.  This annual tradition usually amounts to:

  • Economics isn’t a science.
  • The Nobel in Economics is fake.

Let’s just stop with all the silliness here.  There are Nobel prizes for peace and literature in addition to the hard sciences.  I don’t see anyone in an uproar over how “scientific” they are.  And while I love peace and literature, I don’t know think the work being done in those fields is necessarily more important than economics.  But that’s not important.  What is important is that economics, on its own, is hugely important.  In fact, one could easily argue that economics is the most important science (work, research, who cares what we call it) that is being done.

Given how little we actually know about the economy, how complex economic systems are and how important they are to our everyday lives, it’s imperative that we actually put economics on a pedestal.  How else will we ever become better educated about it and destroy many of the misunderstandings that currently exist in this relatively young field?   If the financial crisis taught us anything it’s that we aren’t paying enough attention to how economics is done and how it can be improved.  That’s a good thing.  And the annual award helps to shed a nice big spotlight on a very important part of the world.

We shouldn’t tear down economics.  We should place even more scrutiny on it.  We should have an insatiable desire to better understand it.  That is the only way to improve economics and help make the world a better place by having more realistic and superior economic policy in place.

Perhaps most importantly, there’s no way Alfred Nobel could have known that economics would be as important today as it is.  After all, economics was a rather untouched field in 1896 when he died.  And I have a feeling, if he knew his name was attached to an award that was helping to improve a much needed and important field, that he wouldn’t object to the award’s existence.

The bottom line is, it’s counterproductive to tear down economists and economics.  These are good people doing important work.  They deserve our scrutiny, but they also deserve great praise when they do great work.  So let’s cut the nonsense about whether economics is a real science or not.  It’s hugely important to the world and at the end of the day that’s really all that matters.