<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHO&#8217;S BUYING OIL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/whos-buying-oil/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/whos-buying-oil</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vfsvfl</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/whos-buying-oil/comment-page-1#comment-6335</link>
		<dc:creator>vfsvfl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=9469#comment-6335</guid>
		<description>The data is interesting but I don&#039;t read TPC to hear what the Casey people think.

If TPC agrees with them, why not explicitly say so?  If not, a disclaimer would be appropriate.  A disclosure about if they&#039;re paying to run the piece would be nice also...

I recall another suspicion-inducing piece, due to its Casey link at the end, ~last week on one of the small handful of blogs I keep up with.  Was that you too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The data is interesting but I don&#8217;t read TPC to hear what the Casey people think.</p>
<p>If TPC agrees with them, why not explicitly say so?  If not, a disclaimer would be appropriate.  A disclosure about if they&#8217;re paying to run the piece would be nice also&#8230;</p>
<p>I recall another suspicion-inducing piece, due to its Casey link at the end, ~last week on one of the small handful of blogs I keep up with.  Was that you too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

