Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas.
Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
Serge
all is fine but there is no reason Bank B would be happy keeping extra deposits. Drop interest on deposits and the issue is solved. Anybody who has any idea about real business of banking (and not only) knows that all companies larger than one office employ some type of FTP systems. This paper provides an artificial example which has no relevance for real life.
I will read the piece but I think banks are doing exactly what they should be doing. They see future write downs on the books and are preparing for it. Combine that with a glut of unworthy borrowers or at least sketchy, and what the hell else are they supposed to do.
EArning interest on the reserves is a great way to bolster the balance sheets. I give it a year before a lot of holes are taken care of. And yes Virginia, there will be future equity raises. I still think C might be ok to dip your toe here.
the answer is a couple pages into Koo’s book. It has nothing to do with lenders and everything to do with a lack of borrowers. If the consumer is focused on paying down debt in these hard times, why on earth would they expand their debt load? Are the companies that you all work for aggressively pursuing credit? But maybe this time will end well.
all is fine but there is no reason Bank B would be happy keeping extra deposits. Drop interest on deposits and the issue is solved. Anybody who has any idea about real business of banking (and not only) knows that all companies larger than one office employ some type of FTP systems. This paper provides an artificial example which has no relevance for real life.
I will read the piece but I think banks are doing exactly what they should be doing. They see future write downs on the books and are preparing for it. Combine that with a glut of unworthy borrowers or at least sketchy, and what the hell else are they supposed to do.
EArning interest on the reserves is a great way to bolster the balance sheets. I give it a year before a lot of holes are taken care of. And yes Virginia, there will be future equity raises. I still think C might be ok to dip your toe here.
the answer is a couple pages into Koo’s book. It has nothing to do with lenders and everything to do with a lack of borrowers. If the consumer is focused on paying down debt in these hard times, why on earth would they expand their debt load? Are the companies that you all work for aggressively pursuing credit? But maybe this time will end well.