<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHY IS CNBC VIEWERSHIP PLUNGING?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>I started watching CNBC about a year ago. As a past set-it-and-forget-it investor my knowledge of the market was sorely lacking and I wanted to get plugged into the latest news. Due to my schedule viewing is limited to early morning so I would watch the show with Carl/Becky/Joe on. Once in a while I would see Art Cashin who seems like a pretty decent guy (not always right, but seems to tell it how he sees it). 

Over the past year I&#039;ve pretty much quit watching because I discovered a new term: permabull. It&#039;s clear that Carl/Becky/Joe are all in that camp which leads to very lopsided and misleading reporting. Its too bad there can&#039;t be more balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started watching CNBC about a year ago. As a past set-it-and-forget-it investor my knowledge of the market was sorely lacking and I wanted to get plugged into the latest news. Due to my schedule viewing is limited to early morning so I would watch the show with Carl/Becky/Joe on. Once in a while I would see Art Cashin who seems like a pretty decent guy (not always right, but seems to tell it how he sees it). </p>
<p>Over the past year I&#8217;ve pretty much quit watching because I discovered a new term: permabull. It&#8217;s clear that Carl/Becky/Joe are all in that camp which leads to very lopsided and misleading reporting. Its too bad there can&#8217;t be more balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4087</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4087</guid>
		<description>Kudlow isn&#039;t there to talk about market.  He is there to broadcast his agenda and talks over his guests.  That guy is wrong so many times.  Watching that show bring me nothing valuable.  I remember Kudlow was screaming Obama&#039;s bear market.  Guess that only apply when the market is down.  Hadn&#039;t heard Kudlow say Obama bull market.  That kind of party trash talk doesn&#039;t really help me to understand the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudlow isn&#8217;t there to talk about market.  He is there to broadcast his agenda and talks over his guests.  That guy is wrong so many times.  Watching that show bring me nothing valuable.  I remember Kudlow was screaming Obama&#8217;s bear market.  Guess that only apply when the market is down.  Hadn&#8217;t heard Kudlow say Obama bull market.  That kind of party trash talk doesn&#8217;t really help me to understand the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4045</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4045</guid>
		<description>Tyler,

If we lose credibility based on our citations I am afraid we have both lost a great deal of credibility already.  As I said before, I often forget to cite sources when I am in the middle of writing.  It&#039;s never intentional. Anyway, I think we&#039;re making a bigger deal of this than it is.  

As you know from our past conversations I am very appreciative of your site and your work.  It&#039;s a daily read of mine and I have cited and linked to your site on more than a few occasions.  I&#039;ve fixed the citation for what it&#039;s worth.  

TPC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler,</p>
<p>If we lose credibility based on our citations I am afraid we have both lost a great deal of credibility already.  As I said before, I often forget to cite sources when I am in the middle of writing.  It&#8217;s never intentional. Anyway, I think we&#8217;re making a bigger deal of this than it is.  </p>
<p>As you know from our past conversations I am very appreciative of your site and your work.  It&#8217;s a daily read of mine and I have cited and linked to your site on more than a few occasions.  I&#8217;ve fixed the citation for what it&#8217;s worth.  </p>
<p>TPC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E B</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4039</link>
		<dc:creator>E B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4039</guid>
		<description>I used to watch Cramer and Fast Money and other programs as well, starting last September.  Then I realized those programs were worthless after watching them a few months.  You cannot get intelligent analysis from those people so why watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to watch Cramer and Fast Money and other programs as well, starting last September.  Then I realized those programs were worthless after watching them a few months.  You cannot get intelligent analysis from those people so why watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Durden</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Durden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>Actually I got it from a source inside Nielsen. Not sure where on their website you think it is available: I actually am curious where on Nielsen.com you can get this data. Like I said before, feel free to grab anything - i really dont care. especially when it has to do with CNBC. Not to make a point out of it, for whatever reason, both Ritholtz and Lidzon cited ZH on that one. (not that I asked for it). 

You do bring up a valid point on the cease and desist: if one were to come from Nielsen, it would be to zerohedge, not to you.

And, lastly, I couldnt care less about a citation... as we share a lot of readers, they know where content comes from, and to some of them it is important. I would hate for you to lose credibility in that fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I got it from a source inside Nielsen. Not sure where on their website you think it is available: I actually am curious where on Nielsen.com you can get this data. Like I said before, feel free to grab anything &#8211; i really dont care. especially when it has to do with CNBC. Not to make a point out of it, for whatever reason, both Ritholtz and Lidzon cited ZH on that one. (not that I asked for it). </p>
<p>You do bring up a valid point on the cease and desist: if one were to come from Nielsen, it would be to zerohedge, not to you.</p>
<p>And, lastly, I couldnt care less about a citation&#8230; as we share a lot of readers, they know where content comes from, and to some of them it is important. I would hate for you to lose credibility in that fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okl</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>okl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>Well, I know CNBC USA is really just another pom-pom show; there are a few good reporters I like though; Dylan Ratigan, David Faber, Diana Olick and Margaret Brennan (when she smiles, I melt).

Of course, D.Ratigan and M.Brennan left CNBC for MSNBC and Bloomberg, so that gives me more reason to turn off CNBC; i used to watch Fast Money when D.Ratigan and Macke was on, but not anymore.

Back to the main topic; the issue is with CNBC USA, if you guys have a bit of time, try watching CNBC Asia, Europe, World; the reporting has alot less cheerleading, which gives more time to ask better questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I know CNBC USA is really just another pom-pom show; there are a few good reporters I like though; Dylan Ratigan, David Faber, Diana Olick and Margaret Brennan (when she smiles, I melt).</p>
<p>Of course, D.Ratigan and M.Brennan left CNBC for MSNBC and Bloomberg, so that gives me more reason to turn off CNBC; i used to watch Fast Money when D.Ratigan and Macke was on, but not anymore.</p>
<p>Back to the main topic; the issue is with CNBC USA, if you guys have a bit of time, try watching CNBC Asia, Europe, World; the reporting has alot less cheerleading, which gives more time to ask better questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4033</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4033</guid>
		<description>Tyler and TPC:

You are both cool dudes. Hate to see you get testy.

Come on..Gimmie all your lovin&#039;:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDI-z6Gomm8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler and TPC:</p>
<p>You are both cool dudes. Hate to see you get testy.</p>
<p>Come on..Gimmie all your lovin&#8217;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDI-z6Gomm8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDI-z6Gomm8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4032</guid>
		<description>Tyler, 

I&#039;m just curious here - do you actually think that image is your property?  It&#039;s obvious that you ripped it off the Nielsen website.  If anyone deserves a citation here it is Nielsen.  And drawing circles on it doesn&#039;t change that....

You post plenty of images and papers on your site without properly citing the source.  You&#039;ve even complained on multiple occasions about your cease and desist orders for accusations of copyright infringement so this is a bit of the pot calling the kettle black, no?  

It happens all the time in the blogosphere....We write a lot of stuff and sometimes the citations get lost in the mix of everything.  It&#039;s not intentional on my end, but it happens.  This isn&#039;t the NY Times we&#039;re running here....I&#039;d think you of all people would understand that.  In the future, I&#039;ll be sure to properly cite your work since it&#039;s obviously a big deal to you and your audience.  Perhaps you&#039;ll be so kind as to return the favor to the work of others before busting people&#039;s chops about it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious here &#8211; do you actually think that image is your property?  It&#8217;s obvious that you ripped it off the Nielsen website.  If anyone deserves a citation here it is Nielsen.  And drawing circles on it doesn&#8217;t change that&#8230;.</p>
<p>You post plenty of images and papers on your site without properly citing the source.  You&#8217;ve even complained on multiple occasions about your cease and desist orders for accusations of copyright infringement so this is a bit of the pot calling the kettle black, no?  </p>
<p>It happens all the time in the blogosphere&#8230;.We write a lot of stuff and sometimes the citations get lost in the mix of everything.  It&#8217;s not intentional on my end, but it happens.  This isn&#8217;t the NY Times we&#8217;re running here&#8230;.I&#8217;d think you of all people would understand that.  In the future, I&#8217;ll be sure to properly cite your work since it&#8217;s obviously a big deal to you and your audience.  Perhaps you&#8217;ll be so kind as to return the favor to the work of others before busting people&#8217;s chops about it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Durden</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Durden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>TPC, Tyler here. Not sure why you are referring to anonymous as me. Feel free to rip off zerohedge as much as you want... Although anon does have a point - Nielsen did not draw the circles :) That being said, I am sure you have sources at Nielsen as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPC, Tyler here. Not sure why you are referring to anonymous as me. Feel free to rip off zerohedge as much as you want&#8230; Although anon does have a point &#8211; Nielsen did not draw the circles <img src='http://pragcap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  That being said, I am sure you have sources at Nielsen as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/why-is-cnbc-viewership-plunging#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6996#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>Hey Silicon Valley, the numbers reflect y-o-y viewship. so are you saying much less people are watching CNBC this July than last year&#039;s July because more people has the money to go on vacation compared to last year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Silicon Valley, the numbers reflect y-o-y viewship. so are you saying much less people are watching CNBC this July than last year&#8217;s July because more people has the money to go on vacation compared to last year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
