WHY THE GOOD JOBS REPORT COULD BE BAD NEWS FOR 2010
Investors are likely to be increasingly concerned about rate increases over the coming months due to the much better than expected non-farm payrolls report. Using the last few recessions as a reference point it is likely that equity gains could become increasingly difficult to come by as the Fed is pressured to remove their accommodative stance and other programs are wound down.
Teun Draaisma at Morgan Stanley recently noted this in his “tightening checklist”. I would expect an upgrade across the checklist. As we expected job creation is certain to begin by Q1 and Fed language should begin to change dramatically.
Despite higher rates coming shortly, MS expects the rally to continue in the near-term. I can’t disagree with this outlook. Stocks are very buoyant heading into Christmas and it’s unlikely that this report will force the Fed’s hand immediately. Like Draaisma, I believe the rally could move higher into year-end based on this optimism, but could then begin to sputter out as 2010 becomes a year of higher rates and transition into an economy without a government crutch. MS analysts report:
We expect the sweet spot to last a bit longer. The cyclical bull market has some further to run, in our view. We expect 20%+ earnings growth in 2010, equity valuations are still attractive versus rates, and sentiment is not ultra-bullish yet. We prefer equities to fixed income, and we expect a further 9% upside to reach our 1200 bull case target for MSCI Europe based on the mid-cycle multiple on mid-cycle earnings of 15x 12% ROE.
Lessons from past tightening cycles. The start oftightening phases tends to lead to some indigestion and a defensive rotation in equity markets, for two quarters or more. The 1994 and 2004 episodes led to a 16% and 8% fall in MSCI Europe over eight and five months. Sector performance was defensive, but Oil and Materials outperformed, too. In the aftermath of secular bear markets tightening phases have been more severe, with equities falling on average 25% over 13 months.
Draaisma notes that it’s silly trying to jump on the back end of a 70% rally in an attempt to time the final leg up. As we wrote earlier this week:
But Draaisma isn’t getting overzealous here. He doesn’t see the rationale in getting overly aggressive in an attempt to capture the last 10% of a 70% rally when the downside could be greater. Draaisma believes market gains will be more difficult going forward and therefore the risk/reward of the current market is substantially more negative than it was a few months ago.
Although this morning’s report is an overwhelming positive for equity markets it could pose a major 2010 hurdle as investors transition from a market with a government crutch to a market without one. In the near-term, a Santa Claus rally might just be developing, however, chasing that move could prove risky as Draaisma says….



Would this be good or bad for gold? I know you think gold is in a bubble, but where does it head if the economy muddles through a 2010 recovery with potential rate hikes? My impression is that this is terrible news, but I would love your input.
Yes, this would be dreadful news for gold. I wouldn’t go near it with a 50 foot pole.
It is sort of ironical, you have to admit, that the rally was built off of the “inflation trade” but it wasn’t. It was built off the dollar destruction trade. The moment the dollar starts to recover stocks fall apart. I still think there’s room to the upside but I bet there will be a lot more volatility ahead. As an aside: at least fertilizer (and POT, MOS, AGU) aren’t as dear!
Lessons from past tightening cycles. …
But in the US in the post-2004 tightening, the markets were positive. I think it depends very much on the the CB rationale for tightening. I think the ECB in that time period, esp. with the new Euro still was fearful of inflation. The US did not care. Unemployment is much better in core Europe than it was in the bad 90′s, I think they will raise prematurely again. The US … why would they change … not until the market forces them to.
How long will the $ bounce? A few days, a week, a month? Its all noise.
This could be a game changer. Can you get short dollars now that rate hikes might be on the way?
We could actually see a huge unwind of dollar shorts over the coming few months.
TPC – what is the bull $ case? It is a structural short. Maybe a few bounces … but that is noise.
Stronger economy gives the US a position to strengthen the balance sheet, higher rates make a bullish case for the dollar, etc etc.
I don’t think this will necessarily pan out in the long-run, but I think this has the potential to cause a near-term rally in the dollar.
Agree. We can have many short term rallies on improved GDP, improved employment, rate hike expectations, hfund deleveraging, small EM crises like Dubai, a stock mkt correction ….. BUT in the longer term the deficits will overwhelm these