Home » Most Recent Stories

WILL THE LEHMAN VACUUM GET FILLED?

10 November 2009 by TPC 6 Comments

Credit spreads have normalized back to their pre-Lehman levels and the recession has officially ended.  Despite this the stock market remains well below the pre-Lehman Brothers bankruptcy levels.  In his latest strategy comment Jeff Saut says the year-end rally is likely to continue (he said buy the dip last week) and could even rebound to the pre-Lehman levels for a full 14% rally from here:

As for the equity markets, while we have wrongly been looking for a correction since the beginning of the fourth quarter, the S&P 500 (SPX/1069.30) still hovers around the same level it was when we turned cautious. To us that’s pretty bullish, for as stated in last week’s letter:

“While our sense is that we are into a secondary correction, our proprietary overbought/oversold indicator is VERY oversold and the number of S&P 500 stocks that are above their 50-DMAs has fallen from more than 90% to 33.2%. Consequently, we continue to think it is a mistake to get too bearish.”

Indeed, despite the “bad mouthing,” all stocks have done over the past month is consolidate their July – September rally by moving sideways. Moreover, that sideways consolidation has seen the equity markets work off their overbought condition into one of being pretty oversold. Ladies and gentlemen, to an underinvested portfolio manager the current environment is a nightmare, especially if you believe as we do that we are going to see an upside celebration into year-end. Manifestly, we have argued that with credit spreads below their pre-Lehman bankruptcy levels there should be no reason why the equity markets can’t “fill up” the downside vacuum created in the charts by said bankruptcy. As can be seen in the following chart, that gives the S&P 500 an upside target of 1200 – 1250. If correct, it implies that the cash rich, underinvested portfolio managers (PMs) will once again be forced to chase stocks higher. Our guess is the PMs will chase the “winners” since the March lows rather than buying the laggards. That suggests investments in emerging and frontier markets, technology, financials, base/precious metals, etc. should trade higher if the aforementioned scenario plays.

The call for this week: Time is running out for the bears if our year-end celebration is going to play. If the major averages break out above their recent reaction highs the party could commence. As for us, we are on the road again this week, so these will likely be the last strategy comments for the week.

We’ve heard this before though.  As we recently mentioned, Credit Suisse agrees with this idea that the Lehman vacuum could be filled:

The disparity between credit indicators at pre-Lehman levels and a market that is still 20% below Lehman levels.

The analysts note that many indicators are substantially better than they were before Lehman Bros. filed for bankruptcy and panic set-in.  Despite this, the market remains well below the pre-Lehman levels.  Specifically, interest rates have declined from 3.73% to 3.38%, ISM has improved from 48 to 58, and corporate BAA spreads have improved by 55 bps.  Despite this, the market remains well below its level of 1252 on the day Lehman filed bankruptcy.

In an attempt to play devil’s advocate I would note a few phenomena that likely justify the price decline since the Lehman bankruptcy:

1)  Real estate prices are 9% lower than they were on the day Lehman filed BK.

2) The total public debt outstanding has risen 25% to $12T (this is truly astounding).

3) The banking sector remains entirely unchanged (read, broken and strewn with moral hazard).   The problems that resulted in the credit crisis remain entirely unresolved.

4) S&P 500 revenues have fallen almost 15% from their Lehman levels

5) I am sure readers can add to this list on both the positive and negative side…..

Does the market deserve to be at its pre-Lehman levels?  Call me skeptical for now, but don’t accuse me of being bearish.  Only a fool stands on the tracks when Bubbly Ben is riding the Dollar Destruction Express!

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

6 Comments »

  • tradeking13 said:

    Add: The unemployment rate was 6.2%.

    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  • Anon said:

    Easy fill. The point is not where the economic indicators were @ Lehaman and now. The point is the direction. Then DOWN, now UP

    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    SpiderTrader Reply:

    If only it were so easy. Following trend lines isn’t the road to riches. If it were that easy we’d all be rich.

    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  • Frederick said:

    Something else that is radically different now: People have witnessed financial horror first hand, and it’s freshly baked into their psyche.

    We’re now way passed ‘fool me once’, and ‘fool me twice’. Three equity bubbles all based on euphoria and cheap money all inside of a decade? Really?

    Something reeks here. A falling dollar may feel fun for a while, but it’s going to cross over at some point on the .DXY free fall into a huge capital flight from the U.S….haven’t seen that movie before.

    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  • Onlooker said:

    Talk about a simplistic and shallow notion/analysis. The idea that the market should be at “pre-Lehman” levels just because the Fed opened the money spigot and we’re borrowing (AKA stealing from future generations) gobs of money to prop things up, with no acknowledgment of the terrible state of our economy and the suffocating debt load (that was being ignored pre-Lehman and is again being ignored); well that just pathetic and either disingenuous or downright stupid.

    This wasn’t just a liquidity crunch that has abated. That was just the straw that broke the camel’s back, finally.

    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  • Onlooker said:

    By the way, TPC, my words were not directed at you but at this premise you have pointed out and countered. I know you know better than that.

    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)