Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Investment StrategyMost Recent Stories

Not Your Father’s 60/40

Research Affiliates has a good piece out that touches on the future difficulty of owning a 60/40 stock/bond portfolio. They predict that a 60/40 will generate a measly 1.2% in real terms going forward.  I am less pessimistic, however, I do think that a 60/40 will fail to generate the types of returns that investors have come to expect.

The November Orcam report touched on the problem of bonds in a portfolio and how a balanced portfolio was likely to disappoint investors going forward. The general idea is rather simple – if a 60/40 stock/bond portfolio generated a 9% annual return over the last 50 years then what should we expect a 60/40 to achieve in a low interest rate environment?  Well, the math is relatively simple.  If an aggregate bond portfolio generated a 7% return over this period then it’s virtually impossible for a 60/40 to generate the same types of returns in the future that it has in the past. With a 30 year T-Bond yielding just 2.4% the math doesn’t work.  And if stocks somehow make up the difference then you’re achieving the same return for more risk (because the stock component is inherently riskier).

This creates quite a problem for investors.  I’ve referred to the 60/40 as one of the latest and greatest performance chasing fads. In essence, investors piling into this strategy are chasing a massive bull market without realizing that this portfolio’s performance is largely due to the incredible performance of bonds.  I’ve estimated that a 60/40 is likely to generate returns of about 5.5% (about 3.5% real).  And interestingly, we’ve already started to see the 60/40’s performance degrade from an average of 9% growth over the last 50 years to just 7.1% over the last 10 years. And if I am right then that figure is likely to drop on average going forward. God forbid stocks stop averaging their 5 year annualized growth rate of  15% (a near certainty).

Today’s 60/40 ain’t your father’s 60/40. And that means investors who are looking for the same risk adjusted return from the 60/40 of old will be forced to find alternative ways to achieve that.