Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Going Mental Over Libor – The Other Side of the Debate

Kate Mackenzie and Izabella Kaminska have a very fair and detailed critique of my thinking on the LIBOR scandal over at FT Alphaville (which, if you don’t read, is an absolute must).   I must admit I was probably a bit general in my analysis (David Merkel was much more detailed and comes to similar conclusions) so it was not surprising to see some commenters come away with the impression that I thought think this whole thing is a non-event.  Quite the contrary.  I think this sheds further light on a massive problem regarding bank disclosure, regulations, among other things.

The broader point is that I thought some pundits were being a bit hyperbolic in claiming that this was the scandal of the ages or something like that. Anyway, I won’t regurgitate what I said, but in the interest of offering both sides of the story, I thought the FT’s critique was very fair, detailed and offers some good counter-points to my thinking.  Read it here.

Comments are closed.