Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Investment StrategyMost Recent Stories

Hedge Funds Stumble Across the 2014 Finish Line

2014 was not a great year for hedge funds as a whole. HFRI reported today that the HFRI Composite Index gained just 3.57% for the year. That was well below the S&P 500’s return of 13.46% and the 4 Fund Global Financial Asset Portfolio’s return of 5.85%. Actually, if we assume a fee structure of 2 & 20 then hedge funds essentially matched the GFAP, but charged their customers about 40% of the total return.

The risk adjusted figures weren’t much better. With a Sharpe ratio of 0.49 the Composite Index underperformed the GFAP (1.8) on a risk adjusted basis.

Of course, the data has been much stronger over longer periods of time. Many hedge funds have generally performed well and have provided a degree of strategic diversification that can’t be found in many low fee index funds. But that’s changed since the early 2000’s and the battle is becoming increasingly difficult for hedge funds as a whole.

As I’ve noted in the past, we’re entering a world where low aggregate returns are likely and that means that precision in asset picking will be the key to generating outsized gains. If I am right that returns could be about 5.5% going forward and you’re charging 2 & 20 then this becomes a losing battle. You can only take 40% of the annual gains for so long before your customers force you to substantially reduce your fees or the industry shrinks.  My guess is that much lower fee strategic diversification is where this industry is headed and it’s headed there faster than many like think.

Source: Hedge Fund Research