Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Myth Busting

IS THE FED OVERPAYING FOR BONDS?

One of the many myths which appears to persist around QE2 is the idea that the NY Fed is massively overpaying for bonds which would, in effect, amount to a fiscal operation.  The idea is simple.  If the NY Fed pays $200 for a 7 year bond that is currently worth $100 then they’re essentially “printing money”.   Is that really happening though?  Not according to the facts.

The nice thing about our increasingly transparent Fed is that they make all of this data available for us online.  So we can actually see these operations, what they paid and what the premium/discount was relative to market prices.  Unfortunately, we don’t get to see the data in real-time, but we do get to see what’s going on by reviewing recent transactions which gives us a very good idea of what they paid relative to current market prices.  For instance, on September 9th the NY Fed executed one of their permanent open market operations.  Interestingly, most of the bonds were bonds that had been auctioned off in the last year so it’s easy for one to conclude that they’re “monetizing” this debt.  Of course, the Fed can’t and doesn’t “fund” the US government so it’s nonsensical to say such things.

Anyhow, the data shows the average price and high price of the $3.345B operation on the 9th.  We can also see today’s current prices (September 21) for these bonds.  Now, the prices have obviously moved since the 9th (a week’s worth of trading) but the prices are not far from where the Fed paid.  In fact, the premiums are rather small (bear in mind this isn’t the exact price from the day of the operation):

Now, I haven’t gone back and done this for every day during QE2 so the data could vary on different days, but I think it’s clear that we can take the Fed seriously when they claim they are buying market prices or near market prices for these bonds.  More importantly, the net interest lost to the banks via the duration reduction is more than offsetting any potential fiscal injection that these bond purchases might be producing.  In 2010 that was in excess of $70B that went directly to the Fed which then goes to Treasury in a direct reduction of the Federal deficit.

Is the Fed overpaying for bonds?  Not according to the data.

Comments are closed.