Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Learning to Love Tax Cuts

Paul Krugman really hates tax cuts which is something that I find pretty weird for a Keynesian.  Here’s his latest post showing that the 2013 Obama tax hike coincided with more private sector job creation than the 2003 Bush tax cut.  He concludes that this “didn’t work” for Bush and that Jeb isn’t learning from big bro’s mistakes with his latest tax plan.

I don’t see the correlation though.  There is obviously a lot more to the economy than tax policy.  And in 2003 we had a deficit that was actually smaller than the Obama deficit.  Yes, if one were using standard Keynesian models then a larger budget deficit should result in more employment.  So, the Obama deficit  added more jobs, which, given how much larger it was, is not really a surprise.

bush_obama

What this chart basically shows is that Bush was a little bit of a Keynesian and Obama was a big time Keynesian.  Which makes me wonder if Paul isn’t arguing politics more than economics here?  Does it really matter that much how we get more countercyclical policy whether it be tax cuts or spending?  After all, tax cuts can be just as effective at raising the deficit as a spending increase.  And we know that deficits add net financial assets to the private sector which improves private balance sheet health and adds to incomes.  The difference is that you’re taking the discretion away from the government and putting it in taxpayer hands.  So, what’s not to love?

NB – Yes, I am aware that spending increases can better target those with a marginal propensity to consume, but we also have to be honest here.  There is no chance in hell that a big spending package would pass in today’s Congress.  So, tax cuts of some type are probably our best bet….