Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent StoriesMyth Busting

Market Volume is Rarely an Indicator of Anything

There’s been a lot of ink spilled in recent years over the “low volume rally” in the equity markets.  In case you don’t know, volume on the NYSE has declined pretty steadily throughout the rally in the equity market and some people take this to mean that the underlying rally lacks credibility.  As if more volume automatically means more “conviction”.  This implies that more heavily traded markets trade more efficiently than less heavily traded markets.  Now, this might be true in an extreme sense.  A thinly traded penny stock will probably trade less efficiently than a high volume member of the S&P 500 because its spread will be thinner.  But that’s not what we’re comparing here.  When people refer to the “low volume rally” they’re taking one of the most heavily traded indices in the world and comparing its relative historical volume.  It’s not exactly the same as comparing the penny stock and the S&P 500 stock.

Anyhow, I think this arguments tends to run into several problems.

1)  The “low volume rally” complaints tend to come from the same people who complain about high frequency trading.  Well, which is it?  Is high frequency trading good because it adds market liquidity?  Isn’t complaining about a “low volume rally” AND HFT a bit of a contradiction?

2) More importantly, high volume doesn’t necessarily mean markets are more rational.  We often hear about the problems revolving around herding in markets.  And that’s ultimately what high volume often amounts to.  High volume is essentially a form of herding where a market becomes saturated due to the herding effect.  And there’s nothing in herd mentality that implies a herd is more efficient than a smaller group of animals all running together.  Yes, the herd MIGHT be more efficient, but history tends to show that the herd is often wrong and more of a sign of building inefficiency.  This means low or high volume can often be a contrarian indicator!

The point is, low relative volume doesn’t necessarily tell us much about the quality of a market’s participants.  In extreme cases I think market volume can tell us something about a market, but be wary about the mantra that “high volume = conviction” and “low volume = lack of conviction”.  There’s more to the puzzle than that.  A lot more.

Comments are closed.