Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

My “Wisdom” on Robo Advisors

Tadas Viskanta has put together a nice collection of opinions regarding the new “Robo Advisor” trend.  Here’s my general view:

“Robo “advisors” aren’t really advisors. They’re robo asset allocators. The robotic allocations are susceptible to flawed risk profiling and inefficient portfolio management for most people with a sophisticated financial plan.  The business of asset allocation is too personal and customized to ever become fully automated so the best solution is some integration between the human and robot sides.”

Some of these are useful new services, but you have to be careful with them. When there’s no advisor involved you’re highly susceptible to poor risk profiling and behavioral problems along the way.  After all, a robo advisor doesn’t help you stick to an asset allocation or help you manage it along the way.  And I’ll be blunt about the risk profiling process for many of these services – it’s dangerously insufficient.  While these are fantastic low cost options for many investors I do think they carry their own unique risks if they’re not utilized appropriately.

In summary, I’d argue:

  • If you have trouble with your own behavioral biases and maintaining an appropriate asset allocation then you might consider a low cost advisor to help you implement the appropriate plan and maintain it.  Additionally, if you’re in need of more planning services then it’s worth bundling a low cost advisor with your portfolio management services.  What’s “low cost” in today’s world – I’d argue it’s anything less than 0.5% per year.
  • If you don’t have trouble with your own behavioral biases and maintaining an appropriate asset allocation through market gyrations then you should just buy a simple Vanguard or Schwab ETF allocation and perform annual maintenance thereby cutting out the extra fees the robos or advisors charge for rebalancing and harvesting tax losses.
  • If you don’t have trouble with your own behavioral biases and maintaining an appropriate asset allocation through market gyrations, but you’re too disorganized or busy to rebalance & harvest losses then you should consider one of the human PLUS robo options such as the Vanguard or Schwab offering.

I wrote much more about this topic a few years back.