Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...

On the Importance of (Constructive) Criticism

A lot of what I write is critical of modern finance and modern economics. This isn’t because I am trying to be mean or hurt people’s feelings. In fact, it is quite the opposite. Most of what I write has one intent – to establish better conclusions about how things work.  Finance and economics are hugely important and hugely complex topics. We are all still figuring it out as we go along. And a big part of that is a persistent back and forth about how things work. People in this field are constantly debating about the merits of technical analysis vs fundamental analysis, micro vs macro econ, Monetarism vs Keynesianism, etc. It’s all one big discussion. No one has all the answers. I certainly know that I don’t.

Of course, money is a very emotional thing. So, many of these discussions can get heated and personal at times. I believe that criticism is an essential ingredient in becoming more intelligent and more informed. I thrive on criticism. In fact, I basically rely on being wrong at times so that people who are smarter than me can show me how I am wrong and how I can improve my understanding. And when I criticize something I am attempting to establish a more balanced and informed perspective. I am trying to be constructive. I am never trying to be destructive. That’s why I don’t engage in ad hominem attacks here. And if it appears ad hominem it’s usually aimed at someone who is obviously much smarter than I am (like Paul Krugman).

The point is, we should embrace criticism where it is constructive because criticism is an important component of becoming more informed. Of course, I am wrong about plenty of things and lots of people criticize me. You should see my inbox at times. It’s not always fun to read. But it’s all part of making progress. I hope I never come across as being personal or ad hominem. That is never my intent. So, with that said, feel free to criticize me all you want. I hope that your criticisms will make me more informed and more intelligent. And I hope you know that my criticisms are all in the effort of being constructive.

Thanks for reading.