Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

STILL A COST DRIVEN PROFIT PICTURE

Good thoughts this morning from David Rosenberg on the early, but developing trend this earnings season – one which has been the primary characteristic of earnings season since the market bottom – revenues are not driving the earnings picture:

It’s interesting to see that earnings surprises seem to be driven by cost surprises rather than revenue surprises.  Consider that for the S&P 500 as a whole, 83% of companies beat earnings expectations with the average “surprise factor” (i.e., results vs. estimates) of 23%. (As a comparison, the average long-run surprise factor for the S&P 500 is 2%.)  However, for revenues, 68% of companies beat expectations but the surprise factor was only 3%, a fraction of the earnings factor.  Yes, it’s early in the season but it does appear at this stage that analysts are underestimating firms’ continued ability to cut costs.

It’s difficult not to wonder about the quality of earnings, given that revenue surprises are significantly lower than earnings. It’s a lot harder to fiddle with revenues than it is costs from an accounting perspective. Fundamental analysts have a pretty good idea about revenues from covering their companies day-in and day-out but it’s harder to know about costs (and write offs, special factorsetc).”

Mr. Rosenberg also notes the deep discrepancy in the financial sector’s results:

“Financials results were interesting.  About 70% of companies beat with an average surprise factor of 63% but on the revenue side, only 43% of companies met expectations (the worst result among the sectors) and the surprise factor is 9%.  So for this sector especially, analysts have misjudged costs (including write-offs) vs. revenues.”

This far this remains a cost driven profit picture.  I fully expect revenues to slowly improve, but anyone looking for a sharp rebound in revenues (and therefore a sharp rebound in hiring) is likely fooling themselves:

Comments are closed.