Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Throwing the Hyperinflationists a Bone….

I spend a lot of time talking about how the US government is not going insolvent.  And while it’s true that changing to a non-convertible fiat currency system eliminated the risk of “running out of money” it didn’t eliminate the risk of currency collapse.  Anyone who understands how the US monetary system is structured knows that the government will never have trouble procuring funds to meet its spending needs.  But this doesn’t mean the government has no constraint at all.

Of course, the government is always constrained by the rate of inflation and the extent to which policy negatively impacts the economy through a real decline in living standards.  So understanding that we can’t “run out of money” doesn’t mean we shouldn’t understand our true constraint.   So that means we need an intricate understanding of hyperinflation, what causes it and whether or not it’s a real threat.

As Deutsche Bank recently highlighted, the move to non-convertible currencies didn’t eliminate sovereign crises.  It just changed how they occur:

“Indeed at the more extreme end of the spectrum, since 1971 the number of recorded hyperinflations
seen throughout the globe has dramatically increased. Figure 22 counts such incidents seen through history in selected buckets.

Although the hyperinflation list perhaps isn’t 100% inclusive, the trend is absolutely beyond dispute. The 1980s and 1990s saw the vast majority of the examples of these occurrences through history. Although all these have been outside of the developed world, this region has also seen many countries with high inflation over the period and with wide divergence between countries.”

So yes, in a way all we’ve done is change the TYPE of insolvency that occurs at the sovereign level.  We haven’t eliminated it.   But it’s important to note that hyperinflation is a very different phenomenon than insolvency or having a funding shortage.   And perhaps most importantly, it’s helpful to understand that hyperinflation is more than a monetary phenomenon.  Please read my section on hyperinflation for more on the true constraint and why it’s not currently a threat in the USA.

Comments are closed.