Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

TOO FAR TOO FAST?

UK bank analyst Jonathon Pierce believes the banks have moved too far too fast.  7 continuing risks make bank stocks unattractive at the current levels:

1. The terms surrounding APS (asset protection scheme) accession are far from certain;

Both LBG and RBS stressed that they were working towards completion of APS but made clear that there were sticking points. One of the issues is the fee, as demonstrated by the fact RBS now has to give up both its 2008 and 2007 deferred tax asset as part of the cost of APS. This adds £500m to the starting point.  Another issue, as we suspected, is how APS loans that are restructured, refinanced or rolled over are treated. Do they continue to be covered by APS? If so, would the EC object to the massive competitive advantage that incumbent banks with capped cost of risk would have in competing for these refinanced loans?

2. There is speculation in the press APS won’t even happen;

3. Net interest income is weakening markedly;

We were worried about net interest income coming into these figures, and our concerns were realised. Combined net interest income across the domestic sector was £18.8bn, down 14% on H2 2008.
4. Aggregate deposit growth is very weak;

We calculate that deposit balances across the sector fell by about 7% in the first half of the year. Part of this fall was due to FX, particularly at RBS, but UK based deposits also fell by about 3% on our numbers.


5. Non-interest income is under pressure;

It was not only net interest income that weakened in H1 2009. Non-interest income, excluding investment banking operations, was also relatively poor.


6. NPL formation will increasingly be biased to non-APS loans;

After an increase of 52% in the first six months of 2009, there is now almost £100bn of impaired loans on the UK domestic banks’ balance sheets. The figure would have been higher were it not for the write-off of certain NPL’s in the period.


7. Tangible NAV impacted by FX.

One of the main features of H1 numbers was the weakness in tangible equity versus our forecasts. We have shown “reported” tangible NAV (adjusted for APS scheme) for simplicity in Figure 14, although our preferred measure strips out the APS fee.

Overall, banks have rallied hard in recent weeks, but at current valuations prices are suggesting a return to normality in the not too distant future, in our view. We think this is optimistic and remain fundamentally cautious.


Source: Credit Suisse

Comments are closed.