Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Will Piketty’s “Capital” Actually Make a Policy Difference?

There’s no question that Thomas Piketty’s book “Capital” is the most important book of the year (which is a real bummer for anyone else who happened to write a finance/econ book in 2014).  He’s touched on a hot button issue and what will likely rage as the debate of our time.

But the real question is not whether the book is a smash hit (though Piketty’s publisher might disagree), but whether the book will actually steer the course of future policy.  This is interesting considering other books like Flash Boys and the almost immediate outrage that it caused.  Within hours it seemed like the FBI and SEC were initiating investigations and getting the policy ball rolling.  But all seems to be quiet on the inequality front.

And this gets to the major problem in Piketty’s book.  While the data appears convincing and certainly well researched there is a good deal of gray area in terms of how problematic inequality really is.  Of course, to some people it appears crystal clear, but to others Piketty’s book sounds like political ideology and little more.   But I don’t know if the people in the middle are convinced yet.

I’ve already expressed my view that Piketty might be overstating the argument to some degree and that the estimates about future growth appear almost naively bearish to me, but I also agree that inequality is a very real threat to our democratic and meritocratic well-being.  In that regard, this is much more a social debate and not so much an economic debate.  I also stated my case for a change in the way we tax investments like dividends and capital gains.

But I am also going to be honest – I don’t see material changes coming there any time soon.  And broader taxes like a wealth tax look almost impossible to me  – the political climate in the USA is just nowhere near big changes like that.  So yes, while the book is certainly the most important economics text of the year, I doubt it will move the policy needle by much because I think Piketty’s argument left too much to be questioned.

Comments are closed.