PREPARE FOR THE “FALSE GROWTH SCARE”
Danske Bank has a nice piece of research out that provides the other side of the bearish view on all the recent economic data. They actually believe the data in the near-term will continue to be very weak. Specifically, they say the ISM data is likely to mean revert (something I wholeheartedly agree with). But they think it’s incorrect to get overly bearish because of this. In fact, they say it will result in a “false growth scare”:
“We believe that we are going to see more signs of weaker activity from different indicators in the coming months. For example, the US ISM manufacturing index is expected to decline in coming months as indicated by the Philadelphia Fed survey. Declines in PMI in other countries such as Euro Flash PMI for May point to a slowing global industrial cycle, which should become visible in the US as well.
Supporting the case for a stronger decline in the ISM manufacturing index is also that hard data have been much weaker than suggested by the ISM index. Firstly, GDP growth was actually below trend in Q1 rising 1.8% q/q annualised. Last time there was such a large divergence between GDP growth and ISM was in 2004 and subsequently we saw a quite fast decline in the ISM index (see chart on page 1). Secondly, industrial production has already slowed. The three-month annualised growth rate was only 1.8% in April, down from the strong levels in mid 2010 of 9.5%.
We believe this may contribute to another “false” growth scare as we have seen quite a few times, when ISM goes down fairly rapidly. At the same time, though, we look for US GDP growth to recover slowly already from Q2 and especially in H2 to a pace of 3.5-4% AR. This will very much mirror what we saw in early 2005 when ISM continued lower coming from a “too high” level relative to hard data while at the same time GDP growth stayed around 3% growth. The growth scare may be heightened by the ongoing budget discussions culminating in late July as we approach the deadline for a raise of the debt limit. This will put focus on the significant tightening of fiscal policy in 2012 and 2013.
As growth recovers and ISM stabilises during autumn, the growth scare should fade again, though, and we may see some relief that growth has not derailed after all.”
Ultimately, they see three primary factors continuing to power the economy higher – declining oil prices, improving jobs and improving credit trends:
“Three factors to support consumption in coming quarters However, the US households will benefit from three important factors:
1. Decline in oil prices: Since early May oil prices have fallen by app. USD15 to USD112 per barrel. We expect oil prices to stay lower and average USD116 for the rest of the year, which means that the PCE deflator is likely to fall back to around 2% by the end of the year giving a lift to real consumption growth of 2 percentage points. This means that more of the rise in nominal spending will feed into real consumption as less is absorbed by price increases.
2. Labour market improving: Another important factor that will underpin consumption growth is the rise in nominal income growth stemming from the improving labour market situation – see Flash Comment: US payrolls point to solid income gains. In April our income proxy derived from the US employment report rose to 5.5%. This income growth stems from a stronger rise in payrolls of 244k and a rise in average hours. Wage growth, though, is very subdued (around 2%) and is dampening overall income growth. In coming quarters we expect job growth to continue around 225-250k and we look for a further rise in average hours. Wage growth is expected to stay low, but in total this should keep nominal income growth in coming quarters around 5-6%.
3. Credit growth rising: The latest Senior Loan Officer Survey pointed to further improvement in credit standards for households and a stronger willingness to lend. Consumers’ demand for credit is also on the rise. This will increasingly underpin private consumption on top of the robust income picture.
In sum, the fundamentals for private consumption look fairly solid and we expect private consumption growth to climb steadily higher in coming quarters to 3.0% in Q2 and 4.0% in Q3 as the headwind from oil prices eases gradually and real income growth rises (there is normally a lag of 1-2 months from oil prices to the PCE deflator). The savings ratio is expected to be broadly flat around 5.5% – as has been the case over the past year after the sharp correction higher during the financial crisis.”
I think this is a pretty reasonable outlook for now. The near-term downside in the economic data will create a headwind for markets, however, I wouldn’t become overly scared about a double dip unless the European crisis gets out of hand, austerity hits the USA or China’s slowdown proves to be something closer to a hard landing.
Source: Danske Bank



So a replay of 2010 baiscally. I have been in this camp from the very beginning of the year. What I am concerned though is that the current cycle looks quite mature, although it was short, because:
1. Commodities are already quite elevated (ok they can reach higher levels still)
2. Profit margins are at peak, hard to keep past earnings growth
3. Equity valuations are also on the high end
4. Monetary tightening in EM / austerity in the West (hard to say how much of a hindrance it is right now, but final demand is structurally weaker than during a normal cycle)
5. Japan in a recession already since Q4 2010
Labor market improving? People dropping out of the system and the unemployment rate goes down. The US as lost 7,5-8 million jobs since Lehman Brothers. 1,5 million jobs are back. 2 million jobs in construction were lost (are they coming back?), 3 million jobs lost in manufacturing (are they coming back?)…..
Interest rates moving up?
…..and falling house prices, the number one financial asset of American households.
Economic progress is hand in hand with government spending and running deficits (that doesn’t matter according to Cheney) putting future generations into shitloads of debt.
#1 lesson: We can always print more money because we can’t technically default.
They can stop teaching Economics at the University because all the old crap is obsolete.
The only thing the US refuses to do is to cut back on military spending. Why is parts to the B-52 bomber produced in every state in the country! President Eisenhower knew!
Why would a profitable company like Heinz be closing domestic manufacturing facilities? There seems to be an inordinate amount of business cycle equivocation going on these days. Not all cycles are similar. The regulatory costs of doing business are going through the roof. The risks of future taxes are immense. Trying to understand the current cycle by extrapolating past cycles is a big mistake.
I am honestly surprised you decided to post this “research”. Their 3 “primary factors to power the economy higher” are all very suspect if not totally incorrect.
#1 Oil prices have come down probably in part because of this soft patch, but only to around $100 WTI and are back above that now. So what do they think is going to happen under their scenario when the economy reaccelerates? Stay where it is of course, which makes absolutely no sense either empirically or intuitively. Complete guesswork and totally flawed analysis.
#2 They base “the labor market is improving” comment solely on the BLS figure which last month was more than 70% hypothesized via birth/death model adjustments. The extremely high birth/death number completely contradicted the trend in the BLS’ own Business Employment Dynamics summary of new business creation, and it’s a red flag if you actually take the time to analyze how the b/d figure is imputed. I suspect they haven’t. Also, look at the complete picture, which includes household survey down 190k, the rising unemployment rate and now persistent jobless claims comfortably above 400k. Again, total nonsense here.
#3 Credit growth rising. As you said yourself, this is not sustainable with private sector balance sheets still a long way from regaining levels of health needed for a prolonged expansion. The only place is see credit expanding rapidly is in the student loan sector, which is hardly a good thing when half of graduating seniors can’t find entry level jobs.
From my impression the only thing false here is passing this off as credible research.
Yup, nothing to worry about, nothing to see here, please move on…
Because sup 2% GDP growth two years out of the trough of the deepest recession ever next to the Great Depression coupled with the most monetary/fiscal stimulus in history as well as a emerging market crack-up boom is nothing abnormal/atypical or something to scratch your head at and say “huh?”…
RB > The only place is see credit expanding rapidly is in the student loan sector . . .
The only reason student loans are expanding is because of the change to rules that makes it more difficult to discharge them in bankruptcy. http://www.studentloanborrowerassistance.org/bankruptcy/
If a graduate can’t get a job that will pay off the loan, and if they can get the loan discharged through bankruptcy, it is hard to fix the finances for that graduate’s household. Multiply this by a million times or more and you will get a long term drag on household spending.
there is also solid (so far) expansion in auto loans. It does not change the whole picture though….
Let’s see:
We’ve mortgaged our kids future; doubled the cost of their education; made it impossible for them to declare bankruptcy and forced them to pay for us to sit around and do nothing at the ripe young age of 65.
What was the name of that movie where anyone over 30 was executed?
Logan’s Run.
B Ferro – right on man, well said. Danske bank just pretty much said we will continue to muddle through from the pits of the great recession.
But it’s hard to see austerit not having an impact later – both in Europe and the US, it’s not like they have a choice eh. – unless we start cracking out some Icars or some google cars…i’d buy me some of those.
To add to what RB said, concerning #1 (let’s see if this works) …
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=BZ
How quickly we seem to have adapted to $100+ per barrel oil as being “normal”. Only a little more than a decade ago oil was less than 10% its current cost. Now we’re “relieved” when it isn’t headed towards $150. From 2002-2008 we had credit expansion to support household standard of living, mitigating this additional burden. Now what? Avg $116 oil is good news? For whom? Interesting what passes for good news these days.
I would also note that if you removed the top 10% of household’s income, real disposable personal income (green line) for the “lower” 90% would be flat to slightly negative.
I agree with the article and CRs commentary. I just wonder if US citizens havent alreafy been scared into agreeing to austerity measures
Not too big an issue by itself, but all Europe, China and US austerity combined might be a much bigger problem…